Click here to order this assignment @Speedywriters.us. 100% Original.Written from scratch by professional writers.

 

Using the Survival Curve dataset tab located in the Framingham Heart Study. dataset,

perform a Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis to determine the survival time (risk of dying) for the Survival Curve data where the patients are divided into treatment groups. Upload the Excel spreadsheet into R Studio or perform the Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Analysis in Excel.

H9 The risk of dying is not related to the patient treatment group. (Null Hypothesis)

H1 The risk of dying is related to the patient treatment group. (Alternative

Hypothesis)

Present your findings as a Survival Time chart in a Word document, with a title page, introduction explaining whyyou would conduct a survival analysis, a discussion where you interpret the meaning of the survival analysis, and a conclusion should be included. Your submission should be 2-3 pages to discuss and display your findings.

Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of two scholarly, peer-reviewed articles. One of these sources may be from the class readings, textbook, or lectures, but the others must be external. The Saudi Digital Library is a good place to find these sources and should be your primary resource for conducting research.

Follow APA and Saudi Electronic University writing standards. Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

You are strongly encouraged to submit all assignments to the Turnltln Originality Check prior to submitting them to your instructor for grading.

https://lms.seu.edu.sa/webapps/blackboard/contenVlistContent.jsp?course_id=_85143_1&content_id=_6253796_1 112

o o

o

41512021 Module 12: lntroduction to Survival Analysis – (Current …

Module 12: Quiz

This quiz consists of 10 questions, with each worth 1 .5 points

https://lms.seu.edu.sa/webapps/blackboard/contenVlistContent jsp?course_id=_85143_1&content_id=_6253796_1 2t2

SEU HCM5O6

CriticalThinking Assignment Rubric – Module 12

Exceeds

Expectation

EEil 17-20 Points

Meets Expectation

13-16 Points 9-12 Points

Limited Evidence

5-8 Points Requirements Expectation –

lncludes allof the required components as specified in the assignment,

Expectation –

lncludes most of the required components as specified in the assignment.

Expectation –

lncludes some of the required components as specified in the assignment.

I Evidence – lncludes few of the required components as specified in the assignment.

33-40 Points 25-32 Points 15-24 Points 7-15 Points Content Exceeds

Expectation – Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials with no errors or major omissions.

Meets Expectation – Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.

Below Expectation – Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.

Limited Evidence – Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.

33-40 Points 25-32 Points 15-24 Points 7-15 Points

Analysis Exceeds Expectation –

Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Meets Expectation – Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Below Expectation – Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Limited Evidence – Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points Sources Exceeds

Expectation – Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Meets Expectation – Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Below Expectation – Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Limited Evidence – Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

Below Expectation

SEU HCMsO5

Critical Thinking Assignment Rubric – Module 12

5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

Exceeds

Expectation – Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph

structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Meets Expectation – Project is fairly wellorganized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good

sentence and paragraph

structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Below Expectation – Project is poorly organized and written, and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. lnconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph

development, and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Limited Evidence – Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations and references.

Mechanics and Writing

Total points possible = 110

Click here to order this assignment @Speedywriters.us. 100% Original.Written from scratch by professional writers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *